卡本特訴合眾國案
| 卡本特訴合眾國案 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | |||||
| 辩论：2017年11月29日 判决：2018年6月22日 | |||||
| 案件全名 | Timothy Ivory Carpenter v. United States of America | ||||
| 诉讼记录号 | 16-402 | ||||
| 引註案號 | 585 U.S. ___ 138 S. Ct. 2206; 201 L. Ed. 2d 507 | ||||
| 既往案件 | A jury in the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan convicted Timothy Carpenter of armed robbery. The conviction was affirmed by Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. Carpenter, 819 F.3d 880 (6th Cir. 2016); cert. granted, 137 S. Ct. 2211 (2017). | ||||
| 辩论 | 口头辩论 | ||||
| 法庭判决 | |||||
| Government acquisition of cell-site records is a Fourth Amendment search, and, thus, generally requires a warrant. | |||||
| 最高法院法官 | |||||
| |||||
| 法庭意见 | |||||
| 多数意见 | 罗伯茨 联名：金斯伯格、布雷耶、索托马约尔、卡根 | ||||
| 不同意见 | 肯尼迪 联名：托马斯、阿利托 | ||||
| 不同意见 | 托马斯 | ||||
| 不同意见 | 阿利托 联名：托马斯 | ||||
| 不同意见 | 戈萨奇 | ||||
卡本特訴合眾國案（英語：Carpenter v. United States[1]），是美國最高法院的一個里程碑式的判例，涉及手機位置資訊（CSLI）的隱私問題。[2]美國首席大法官約翰·羅伯茨提出的5–4判決之裁定，致法院認爲美國政府違反了美國憲法第四修正案，即因政府搜查了手機位置資訊的歷史記錄，其中也包含沒有搜查令的手機之實際位置資訊。
註釋
[编辑]- ^ No. 16-402, 585 U.S. ____ (2018) (PDF). [2020-11-09]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2018-06-22）.
- ^ Ng, Alfred. Supreme Court says warrant necessary for phone location data in win for Privacy. cnet.com. June 22, 2018 [June 22, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2018-06-22）.
延伸閲讀
[编辑]- Trevor Burrus & James Knight, Katz Nipped and Katz Cradled: Carpenter and the Evolving Fourth Amendment, 2017-2018 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 79 (2018)
- Caminker, Evan. Location Tracking and Digital Data: Can Carpenter Build a Stable Privacy Doctrine?. Supreme Court Review. 1 May 2019, 2018: 411–481 [2020-11-09]. ISSN 0081-9557. doi:10.1086/702164. （原始内容存档于2020-11-22）.
- Donohue, Laura K. Functional Equivalence and Residual Rights Post-Carpenter: Framing a Test Consistent with Precedent and Original Meaning. Supreme Court Review. 1 May 2019, 2018: 347–410. ISSN 0081-9557. doi:10.1086/704133.
- Susan Freiwald & Stephen Wm. Smith, The Supreme Court, 2017 Term — Comment: The Carpenter Chronicle: A Near-Perfect Surveillance, 132 Harv. L. Rev. 205 (2018)
- Chaker, Vania. Your Spying Smartphone: Individual Privacy Is Narrowly Strengthened in Carpenter v. United States, The U.S. Supreme Court's Most Recent Fourth Amendment Ruling. Journal of Tech Law. 21 September 2018 [21 September 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-01-27）.
- Chaker, Vania. Chimaera I: Chimaera Unleashed: The Specter of Warrantless Governmental Intrusion Is a Phantom that Has Achieved Greater Life in the Ether of Internet Communications. Journal of Tech Law. 6 August 201, 23 [6 August 2019]. （原始内容存档于2020-07-19）.
參見
[编辑]判例
[编辑]- 萊利訴加利福尼亞州案(573 U.S. __ (2014))
- 凱洛訴美國案(533 U.S. 27 (2001))
- 美國訴卡羅案(468 U.S. 705 (1984))
主題
[编辑]- 手機追踪(手機位置循跡)
其它
[编辑]外部連結
[编辑]- Carpenter v. United States, No. 16-402, 585 U.S. ____ (2018)的文本可参见：Justia · Supreme Court (slip opinion)
- Case page （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） at SCOTUSblog